Imperfect

ask for donations

Inspired by Andre's Why People Should Not Ask for Donations or Money to Run Their Own Personal Blog and Loren's reply to it, On - Why People Should Not Ask for Donations or Money to Run Their Own Personal Blog.


Signposting a desire skyrockets its likelihood. See bloggers asking their readers to email them, give them upvotes, comment on their guestbook, or subscribe to their feed. As one of 1000 fearless asks, you can just ask for donations or money through your blog. What's the difference between that and the former asks if offerings can be put to great, ideally reciprocal, use? In my eyes, it's the higher level of commitment that donors reach relative to others.

Asking counts whether you blog as a hobby or a living. It counts whether you "write from your small corner of the internet for pleasure, to meet new people, or simply for engagement". It counts whether gifts go toward running your blog, enriching your life, or any other reason. You can be more creative with your online exchanges beyond donations or money, exploring how you can just barter actions and other modes entirely.

Combining your agency with a clear disclosure curbs reader entitlement, writing avoidance, and self-censorship. Testing different donation availability preferences across multiple personal spaces could also work well. You're taking advantage of how you can have many more digital homes than their physical counterparts, right? How can that abundance mindset inform other experiments to maximize optional transactions and minimize how they can malign behavior?

The slim cost, low barrier to entry, and many avenues of blogging encourage circulating goods and services through the people behind blogs now more than ever. Share the love easier thanks to having more money in your pocket, more resources with less setup and maintenance, and greater visibility of compelling writers. Show people how salient their work is by putting your money or other meaningful contributions where your mouth is.

Writers can develop the resolve to own their writing regardless of financial pressure, optional donations, and other external factors. That approach seems more resilient than making your writing livelihood dependent on outside pressure imposed upon you. Many creatives combine a space to think out loud while accepting and even sharing offerings with the people they value. How can you emulate their distribution in a manner that suits you?

Your work can be valuable for one to few people while justifying its existence, performing, and growing. How much more value can it accrue among many more people while remaining intact?